How MattPM Spots Underperforming Developers

In the complex world of software engineering, identifying genuine underperformance is often clouded by outdated metrics and subjective feelings. The developer who appears perpetually “busy” might be less productive than the one quietly shipping clean, efficient code. MattPM solves this problem by moving beyond vanity metrics and leveraging an intelligent system to derive context and true effort from every Git activity.
The End of the Lines of Code (LOC) Fallacy
For decades, Lines of Code (LOC) has been the default, yet deeply flawed, proxy for developer productivity. MattPM’s philosophy rejects this metric for several critical reasons, understanding that it actively encourages negative behavior:
- It Punishes Quality Work: LOC fails to capture one of the highest-value engineering activities: refactoring. A great developer often removes hundreds of lines of complex, legacy code to replace it with a dozen lines of clean, simple logic. LOC metrics would register this crucial simplification as “negative productivity.”
- It Rewards Bloat and Inefficiency: When measured by LOC, developers are incentivized to write verbose, padded implementations, inflate their code volume with unnecessary comments, or avoid using efficient libraries and frameworks. This results in technical debt and increased maintenance costs, which is the opposite of high performance.
- It Ignores Complexity: A single-line change to a core security function might require days of research, testing, and architecture review, delivering immense value. A one-hundred-line change to boilerplate UI code might take an hour. LOC treats these two tasks as being 100-to-1 in value, which is demonstrably false.
Estimating True Effort with AI
MattPM replaces the flawed quantitative approach of LOC with a smart analysis powered by an LLM. This LLM doesn’t just count activity; it reads and understands it.
The smart system analyzes all relevant development artifacts to produce an objective Effort Score that accounts for context:
- Code Context Analysis: The LLM processes the content of commits, PR descriptions, and issue summaries. It recognizes when a small code change resolves a complex, critical bug versus when a large code change is simply routine feature addition.
- Complexity Recognition: By analyzing the structure and content of the codebase where the changes are made, the LLM is able to estimate the cognitive complexity of the task, ensuring a developer who solves a thorny problem with minimal code gets ranked higher than someone who churns out simple, high-volume additions.
Highlighting Low Engagement Patterns
Crucially, MattPM’s LLM also provides granular data on a developer’s daily commitment pattern based on consistent Git activity (commits, reviews, comments).
- Low Daily Activity: The system is configured to highlight developers who are estimated to work less than 4 hours per day based on the frequency and timing of their meaningful contribution signals.
- Repetitive Patterns: MattPM identifies a repetitive pattern of working less on a weekly or monthly basis, distinguishing between normal fluctuations (e.g., occasional sick day) and chronic low engagement (e.g., consistently under-committing every week). This data allows managers to address potential burnout, distraction, or disengagement using objective evidence rather than guesswork.
What are you waiting for?
Connect your Git to https://mattpm.ai and get automated daily standups and performance reports in your inbox.